Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Elderly Patients with Acute and Advanced Heart Failure: Palliative Care Needs-Analysis of the EPICTER Study.

Introduction: There are studies that evaluate the association between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and heart failure (HF) but there is little evidence regarding the prognosis of this comorbidity in older patients admitted for acute HF. In addition, little attention has been given to the extracardiac and extrapulmonary symptoms presented by patients with HF and COPD in more advanced stages. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of COPD on mortality in elderly patients with acute and advanced HF and the clinical manifestations and management from a palliative point of view. Methods: The EPICTER study ("Epidemiological survey of advanced heart failure") is a cross-sectional, multicenter project that consecutively collected patients admitted for HF in 74 Spanish hospitals. Demographic, clinical, treatment, organ-dependent terminal criteria (NYHA III-IV, LVEF <20%, intractable angina, HF despite optimal treatment), and general terminal criteria (estimated survival <6 months, patient/family acceptance of palliative approach, and one of the following: evidence of HF progression, multiple Emergency Room visits or admissions in the last six months, 10% weight loss in the last six months, and functional impairment) were collected. Terminal HF was considered if the patient met at least one organ-dependent criterion and all the general criteria. Both groups (HF with COPD and without COPD) were compared. A Kaplan−Meier survival analysis was performed to evaluate the presence of COPD on the vital prognosis of patients with HF. Results: A total of 3100 patients were included of which 812 had COPD. In the COPD group, dyspnea and anxiety were more frequently observed (86.2% vs. 75.3%, p = 0.001 and 35.4% vs. 31.2%, p = 0.043, respectively). In patients with a history of COPD, presentation of HF was in the form of acute pulmonary edema (21% vs. 14.4% in patients without COPD, p = 0.0001). Patients with COPD more frequently suffered from advanced HF (28.9% vs. 19.4%; p < 0.001). Consultation with the hospital palliative care service during admission was more frequent when patients with HF presented with associated COPD (94% vs. 6.8%; p = 0.036). In-hospital and six-month follow-up mortality was 36.5% in patients with COPD vs. 30.7% in patients without COPD, p = 0.005. The mean number of hospital admissions during follow-up was higher in patients with HF and COPD than in those with isolated HF (0.63 ± 0.98 vs. 0.51 ± 0.84; p < 0.002). Survival analysis showed that patients with a history of COPD had fewer survival days during follow-up than those without COPD (log Rank chi-squared 4.895 and p = 0.027). Conclusions: patients with HF and COPD had more severe symptoms (dyspnea and anxiety) and also a worse prognosis than patients without COPD. However, the prognosis of patients admitted to our setting is poor and many patients with HF and COPD may not receive the assessment and palliative care support they need. Palliative care is necessary in chronic non-oncologic diseases, especially in multipathologic and symptom-intensive patients. This is a clinical care aspect to be improved and evaluated in future research studies.

Insuficiencia suprarrenal secundaria persistente tras tratamiento prolongado con corticoides / Chronic secondary suprarrenal failure after prolonged corticosteroid treatment

Los glucocorticoides son fármacos frecuentemente usados de forma crónica para el tratamiento de enfermedades autoinmunes, hematológicas y neoplasias avanzadas. Sin embargo, representan una causa común de insuficiencia suprarrenal terciaria. Por lo tanto, la terapia de reemplazo corticoidea puede ser frecuente tras la administración crónica de glucocorticoides. Presentamos el caso clínico de una paciente de 65 años en tratamiento crónico con glucocorticoides debido a una sarcoidosis pulmonar diagnosticada en 2012. A pesar de la reducción gradual del tratamiento, una vez que la patología estaba en remisión, la paciente es diagnosticada de insuficiencia suprarrenal ante la persistencia de clínica de astenia intensa y sudoración profusa y haber descartado una reactivación de su proceso. Se debe sospechar Insuficiencia suprarrenal en todo paciente que ha estado en tratamiento crónico con tratamiento glucocorticoideo. La retirada gradual del tratamiento con glucocorticoides a lo largo de las semanas es una práctica comúnmente extendida que minimiza el riesgo de Insuficiencia suprarrenal pero no lo anula. La determinación del cortisol basal al menos 18 horas de la última dosis de glucocorticoides puede ser útil para evaluar el eje hipofisario-adrenal y retirar con seguridad el tratamiento con glucocorticoides.(AU)

Glucocorticoids are drugs widely used chronically to treat various autoimmune, haematological conditions and advanced malignancies. Nevertheless, glucocorticoids are considered a common cause of tertiary adrenal insufficiency. Therefore, patients may require glucocorticoid replacement therapy after chronic use of glucocorticoids. We report the clinical case of a 65-year-old patient on chronic glucocorticoid treatment due to pulmonary sarcoidosis diagnosed in 2012. Despite gradual tapering of treatment once the main disease was in remission, the patient was diagnosed with adrenal insufficiency due to persistent clinical symptoms of intense asthenia and profuse sweating once reactivation of her disease was ruled out. Adrenal insufficiency should be suspected in every patient on chronic glucocorticoid treatment. Gradual tapering of glucocorticoid treatment over weeks is a common clinical practice that minimizes the risk of adrenal insufficiency but does not eliminate it completely. Determination of basal cortisol at least 18 hours after the last dose of glucocorticoid may be useful to evaluate the pituitary-adrenal axis and safely withdraw glucocorticoid treatment.(AU)

Comparación de los índices PROFUND y PALIAR en pacientes pluripatológicos con enfermedad crónica no oncológica en fase avanzada / Comparison between PROFUND and PALIAR indexes in polypathological patients with advanced non-oncologic chronic diseases

Fundamento y objetivo: Comparar la rentabilidad de los índices PALIAR y PROFUND para predecir la mortalidad en pacientes pluripatológicos con enfermedad crónica no oncológica en fase avanzada. Material y métodos: Estudio de cohortes, prospectivo y multicéntrico con pacientes pluripatológicos con enfermedades crónicas no oncológicas en fase avanzada ingresados en departamentos de medicina interna entre el 1 de julio y el 31 de diciembre de 2014. Se recogieron datos de edad, género, categorías de pluripatología, enfermedad avanzada, comorbilidad, valoración funcional y cognitiva, síntomas de enfermedad terminal, necesidad de cuidador, ingresos en los 3 y 12 meses previos, número de fármacos, y se calcularon los índices PROFUND y PALIAR. Tras un seguimiento durante 12 meses la mortalidad se valoró con las curvas de supervivencia de Kaplan-Meier y la rentabilidad de los índices con las curvas ROC. Resultados: Se incluyeron 213 pacientes con edad media 83 (7) años y 106 (49,8%) eran mujeres. La mortalidad a los 6 meses fue del 40,4% y a los 12 del 50,2%. Los pacientes fallecidos puntuaban más alto en los índices PROFUND [11,2(4,2) frente a 8,5(3,9); p<0,001] y PALIAR [6,7 (4,6) frente a 3,6 (3,1); p<0,001]. La capacidad discriminativa del índice PALIAR a los 6 meses (área bajo la curva 0,734; IC95% 0,665-0,803) fue superior a la del índice PROFUND y no hubo diferencias a los 12 meses. Conclusiones: En pacientes pluripatológicos con enfermedad crónica en fase avanzada el índice PALIAR tiene un rendimiento mayor que el índice PROFUND para predecir la mortalidad a los 6 meses y similar a los 12 meses

Background and objective: To compare the discrimination power of PROFUND and PALIAR indexes for predicting mortality in polypathological patients with advanced non-oncologic chronic disease. Material and methods: Prospective multicentre cohort study. We included polypathological patients with advanced non-oncologic chronic disease, who were admitted to internal medicine departments between July 1st and December 31th, 2014. Data was collected from each patient on age, sex, categories of polypathology, advanced disease, comorbidity, functional and cognitive assessment, terminal illness symptoms, need for caregiver, hospitalisation in the past three and 12 months and number of drugs. We calculated the PROFUND and PALIAR indexes and conducted a 12-month follow-up. We assessed mortality with the Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the discrimination of indexes with the ROC curves. Results: We included 213 patients with a mean (standard deviation) age of 83.0 (7.0) years, 106 (49.8%) of whom were female. Mortality at six months was 40.4% and at 12 months 50.2%. Deceased patients scored higher scores on the PROFUND [11.2(4.2) vs 8.5(3.9); P<.001] and PALIAR [6.7 (4.6) vs 3.6(3.1); p<0,001] indexes. The discrimination of PALIAR index at six months (under the curve area 0.734 95%CI 0.665-0.803) was higher than of PROFUND, and there was no difference at 12 months. Conclusions: In polypathological patients with advanced non-oncologic chronic disease, the PALIAR index had better discrimination power than PROFUND index at 66 months and there were no differences at 12 months

Comparison between PROFUND and PALIAR indexes in polypathological patients with advanced non-oncologic chronic diseases. / Comparación de los índices PROFUND y PALIAR en pacientes pluripatológicos con enfermedad crónica no oncológica en fase avanzada.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To compare the discrimination power of PROFUND and PALIAR indexes for predicting mortality in polypathological patients with advanced non-oncologic chronic disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective multicentre cohort study. We included polypathological patients with advanced non-oncologic chronic disease, who were admitted to internal medicine departments between July 1st and December 31th, 2014. Data was collected from each patient on age, sex, categories of polypathology, advanced disease, comorbidity, functional and cognitive assessment, terminal illness symptoms, need for caregiver, hospitalisation in the past three and 12 months and number of drugs. We calculated the PROFUND and PALIAR indexes and conducted a 12-month follow-up. We assessed mortality with the Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the discrimination of indexes with the ROC curves. RESULTS: We included 213 patients with a mean (standard deviation) age of 83.0 (7.0) years, 106 (49.8%) of whom were female. Mortality at six months was 40.4% and at 12 months 50.2%. Deceased patients scored higher scores on the PROFUND [11.2(4.2) vs 8.5(3.9); P<.001] and PALIAR [6.7 (4.6) vs 3.6(3.1); p<0,001] indexes. The discrimination of PALIAR index at six months (under the curve area 0.734 95%CI 0.665-0.803) was higher than of PROFUND, and there was no difference at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: In polypathological patients with advanced non-oncologic chronic disease, the PALIAR index had better discrimination power than PROFUND index at 66 months and there were no differences at 12 months.

External validation of the PALIAR index for patients with advanced, nononcologic chronic diseases.

OBJECTIVE: To externally validate the PALIAR index for patients with advanced, nononcologic chronic diseases. METHODS: We performed a prospective, multicenter cohort study that included patients with advanced, nononcologic chronic diseases hospitalized in internal medicine departments and treated consecutively by the researchers between July 1st and December 31st, 2014. Data were collected from each patient on age, sex, advanced disease, Charlson index, comorbidities, Barthel index, terminal illness symptoms, need for caregiver, hospitalization in the past 3 and 12 months and number of drugs. We calculated the PALIAR index and conducted a 6-month follow-up. To analyze the association between the variables and mortality, we constructed several multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: The study included 295 patients with a mean age of 82.7 (8.6) years, 148 (50.2%) of whom were women. Mortality at 6 months was associated with the albumin level (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.30-0.85, p = 0.011), and the terminal illness (OR 2.75, 95% CI 1.55-4.89, p = 0.001). The PALIAR index showed good discrimination for predicting mortality (statistical C, 0.728, 95% CI 0.670-0.787). A reduced version of the PALIAR index showed similar mortality discriminatory power. CONCLUSIONS: The PALIAR index is a reliable tool for predicting mortality in patients with advanced, nononcologic chronic diseases.